THE HIGHWIRE #156 AND #157 – EN

The Highwire #156 – TRUMP VS. FAUCI, BATTLE OF AGENDA’S, March 26, 2020, length of time 2:15:00
A Concise transcription

LINK TO THE VIDEO
LINK TO THE HIGHWIRE WEBSITE

19:00 – Del Bigtree: There seems to be a divide, more than there has ever been. President Trump versus Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of the NIAID. Chloriquine versus a vaccine. What’s the better option? We’ll find out later. Let’s look at the agenda’s. All human beings have agenda’s, and the agenda’s effects their decision making. The agenda of the president is to be re-elected. Dr. Tony Fauci is a very important person when it comes to health in the world. But the NIAID is working with Moderna to create a vaccine.

25:50 – Del Bigtree: 50 to 70% of the advertisement income of the mainstream media is from Farma. All newsreporters and newsanchors are actually working for the farmaceutical industry. If you want proof of that, watch television and see all the ads of farmaceutical products.

34:00 Mehmet Oz M.D.: ‘Chloroquine is a possible treatment that can save lives. A pilot test showed that you can get rid of the virus in six days for a 100% of the patients treated in the pilot, 20 out of 20. It’s unethical to withhold it. This is a very positive development’.

40:25 – Paul Offit, M.D. and Peter Hotez, both of them have spoken out how dangerous a coronavirus vaccine is and rushing to it would be an incredible mistake. Tony Fauci, the one we rely on, said ‘we should be careful about chloroquine because we haven’t done proper studies, we only have anecdotal evidence, we don’t know how dangerous the drug could be’. Del Bigtree: ‘but the drug has been used for 75 years! We have 75 years of data about the safety of chloroquine and an absolute zero days of a corona vaccine. The ones who say a vaccine is our only hope!? It doesn’t even exists!’

42:00 – WHO Immunisation Agenda 2030 – A Global Strategy To Leave No One Behind.

A world where everyone, everywhere, at every age … fully benefits from vaccines …

55:00 – Donald Trump wants to open America up by Easter. Chris Cuomo says this is not supported by any expert on this matter. Del Bigtree finds out it is:

58:00 – 1:11:00 the following scientists state interesting things about COVID-19 that contrast with msm reporting:

  • Dr. Paul Offit
  • Dr. Frank Ulrich Montgommery
  • Dr. Didier Raoult MD PhD
  • Professor Pietro Vernazza MD
  • Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi MD
  • Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg
  • Dr. Joel Kettner
  • Dr. John Ioannidis
  • Dr. David Katz
  • Dr. Dan Yamin PhD
  • Prof. Yoram Lass
  • Dr. Peter Gøtzsche MD

For Example Dr. Didier Raoult MD PhD: ‘Actually, from all respiratory infections it’s [COVID-19] probably the easiest to treat. So there is really no reason to get excited anymore. There is really no reason to get excited and rush to produce a vaccine..”.

Another example, Prof. Yoram Lass says that the new coronavirus is “less dangerous than the flu” and  lockdown measures “will kill more people than the virus.” He adds that “the numbers do not match the panic” and “psychology is prevailing over science.” He also notes that “Italy is known for its enormous morbidity in respiratory problems, more than three times any other European country”.

And for example Dr. Peter Gøtzsche MD: ‘Almost everyone I talk to, lay people and colleagues … consider the Coronavirus pandemic a pandemic of panic, more than anything else.’

1:43:00 – Jefferey Jaxen investigative journalist: ‘Neil Ferguson, UK epidimiologist, downgraded his Coronavirus death prediction for the UK from 500,000 down to 20,000 and finally down to 5,700.

Del Bigtree: ‘That makes this is no worse than any other flu’. ‘Either this is a hoax, a fraud or the biggest mistake ever in the medical history ever made.’ 

1:46:00 – President Trump: ‘I don’t want the cure to be worse than the problem itself’.

1:47:30 – Toby Rogers Phd MPP, political economist: ‘We have 50 years of data. What we see when unemployment increases is, lots of people die, we have very good data on this. For example one study in 1976 says: when unemployment goes up by 1%, what happens to mortality? Well, about 36,000 people in the U.S. will die, in about 5 years after. Economies are big things and slow things, it takes a while before you see the health effects to ripple through the system. About half of those deaths are from heartattacks, but you see also what we call deaths of despair. Increases in alcoholism, increases in suicide, increases in homicide, increase of incarceration and you see more people end up in mental hospitals. These are profound health effects of increases of unemployment. 42 studies in the later 45 years show similar results. Meanwhile the U.S. population has increased about 60% so now 1% increase of unemployment would cause 58,000 deaths, deaths of despair. But where not talking about 1% increase, the U.S. jobless rate may soar to 30%, Fed’s Bullard says. The current models completely ignore the deaths of despair, all they cared about was the virus.’

Del Bigtree: ‘Do we know how many Americans have just enough money for a couple of days?’

Toby Rogers: ‘Yes, we have good data on that. The Federal Reserve makes a report on the Economic Well-Being of Households every year. 39% of the Americans would have trouble covering an unexpected expense of $400,-. And 51% of small businesses will only be able to continue to operate for 0-3 months. So a lockdown for 18 months is catastrophic. It is bizar.’

Del Bigtree: ‘Have you figured how many damage we’ve already done today?’

Toby Rogers: ‘Economies are big slow things. Once they’ve been shut down, it takes a while to bring things back up again. We’re at Great Depression levels in only a few weeks, this is what we have never seen in our history. But we need better modelling and the data, the data underneath the modelling are hopeful. But shutting down the economy for 18 months is madness, irresponsible and preposterous. The tragedy is that it’s not necessary. Their are lots of other options.’

2:07:00 – Del Bigtree: ‘The difference between msm and The Highwire is that we don’t only listen to experts but we dig in the data ourselves. That’s our job as a reporter. We have got to dig deeper. … Watch closer America. Please stop listening to experts and start asking experts to show you the numbers. Show us your models, we are smart enough to understand this. Show us what we are supposed to be afraid of!’

The Highwire #157 – DATA or DECEIT , THE COVID-19 PEAK, April 2th, 2020, length of time 1:57:00
A Concise transcription

LINK TO THE VIDEO

11:00 – Coronavirus tests bound for UK become contaminated with coronavirus.

12:32 – Dr. Vladimir Zelenko has now treated 699 coronavirus patients with 100% success using Hydrochloroquine Sulfate, Zinc and Z-Pak. Treatment costs $20,-. Experience with the medicine over 75 years. The symptoms of the breath resolve in 4 to 6 hours.

17:30 – Prescribing Chloroquine, what do we have to loose? Asks Donald Trump.

Investigative reporter of The Highwire Jefferey Jaxen: ‘In my opinion nothing. It seems counterproductive not to do it. What’s at stake here? There’s so much at stake. We know for a couple of dollars doctors can prescribe this. We don’t have to wait. We can prescribe it with zinc and off it goes. What’s the negative component to this? When you have a plus and minus column I see a lot of pluses and not many minuses here.’

19:28 – Bill Gates Calls for a “Digital Certificate” to Identify Who Received COVID-19 Vaccine.

Bill Gates recently stated on Reddit that “digital certificates” will be used to identify who received the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine. And These Certificates will also be used to identify who can conduct business or not. Here’s how this pan is already backed by a massive organization called ID2020.

19:33 – Bill Gates says Donald trump needs to lockdown the U.S. for SIX WEEKS to have any hope of ‘flattening the curve’ of the coronavirus infection rate. [Quote during an online TED Talk]

35:02 – CBS News admits ‘mistake’ after airing footage of overcrowded Italian hospital in report about NYC.

Comments Del Bigtree: this is not a one person mistake, there are barriers to make sure no mistakes are made. 7 to 10 people decide what will or will not be in the program.

39:30 – Citizens film in and around hospitals in the USA that are the center of corona treatments. What do they see there? A ghosttown. There are no people. [not verified]

53:32 – Daily Mail, Peter Hitchen’s blog, 29-03-2020: There’s Powerful Evidence This Great Panic Is Foolish. Yet our freedom is still broken and our economy crippled. Last week I dared to challenge the official wisdom and drew abuse as well as significant support.

57:39 The Euro momo website (mortality monitoring in Europe) does not show an extra high mortality rate, except for Italy and Spain.

1:03:00 Open letter from Professor Sucharit Bhakdi to German Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel: The Internationally recognized International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents will soon publish a paper that addresses exactly this question [ …] . Preliminary results of the study can already be seen today and lead to the conclusion that the new virus is NOT different from traditional corona viruses in terms of dangerousness. The authors express this in the title of their paper “SARS-CoV-2: Fear versus Data”. At the same time, the mistake is being made worldwide to report virus-related deaths as soon as it is established that the virus was present at the time of death – regardless of other factors. This violates a basic principle of infectiology: only when it is certein that an agent has played a significant role in the disease or death may a diagnose be made. My question: Has Germany simply followed this trend of a COVID-19 general suspicion? And: is it intended to continue this categorisation incritically as in other countries? How, then, is a distinction to be made between genuine corona-related deaths and accidental virus presence at the time of death?

1:06:00 JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, Anthony S. Fauci, e.o.: Covid-19 – Navigating the Uncharted

‘If someone assumes that the asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0,1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had  case fatality rates of 9% to 10% and 36%, respectively.’

1:18:10 – The coronavirus deaths will not be in addition to these, as statistician Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter, an expert in public understanding of risk at the University of Cambridge, explains.

“There will be substantial overlap in these two groups – many people who die of Covid [the disease caused by coronavirus] would have died anyway within a short period.”

1:25:45 – NVSS National Vital Statistics System per email: ‘It is important to emphasize that Coronavirus Disease 2019 or COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decendents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.

If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II (of the death certificate).’ (!?)

1:28:15 – NVSS National Vital Statistics System, another email: COVID-19 Alert No. 2, March 24, 2020.

‘New ICD code introduced for COVID-19 deaths. This email is to alert you that newly-introduced ICD has been implemented to accurately capture mortality data for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on death certificates. Please read carefully and forward this email to state statistical staff in your office who are involved in the preparation of mortality data, as well as others who may receive questions when the data are released.’

Comments from Del: ‘This mail is dated March 24, that is the date when you see the Corona deaths exploding.’

1:28:50 – What happens if the terms reported on the death certifi cate indicate uncertainty? ‘If the death certificate reports terms such as “probable COVID-19” or “likely COVID-19”, these terms would be assigned the new ICD code. It is not likely that NCHS will follow up on these cases.’

1:32:00 – Del Bigtree: ‘If the authorities state that only the states with the greatest need receive support, then all states want to show with their figures that the need in their state is high, because they don’t want to be blamed for not having acted quickly enough afterwards. This exaggerates the number of corona infections and deaths.’

1:38:00 – Peter Gøtzsche MD: “Should it turn out that the epidemic wanes before long, there will be a queue of people wanting to take credit for this. And we can be damned sure draconian measures will be applied again next time. But remember the joke about tigers. ‘Why do you blow the horn?’ ‘To keep the tigers away.’ ‘But there are no tigers here.’ ‘There you see!’”